"A Study of the Public Interest Test in Australian Freedom of Information
Law"
Daniel Abrahams
1994 (Wol) 8 AAL
The paper examines the nature of the public interest balancing
tests which are found in both the Commonwealth's and the various State's
FOI legislation. ('by which any number of relevant interests may be weighed
one against another') It discusses the limited judicial determination of
the meaning of, as well as factors which are considered to be irrelevant
to the public interest criterion. The evolution of the Federal AAT's decisions
on the concept of the public interest is traced, with the conclusion that
the most recent changes in the approach lie in direct conflict with the
Federal Court's approach. The reasons as to the demise of the 'Howard Tests'
of the public interest are also analysed. The study concludes with public
interest test issues in the Commonwealth arena with suggestions for potential
improvements, at times building on the discussion of the States.
Return to Wollongong Studies page