A Comparative Review of External Review Systems used in Australian Freedom
of Information Legislation with a View to Finding an Improved System for
NSW
Tim Castle
1994 (Wol) 5 AAL
The paper reviews a number of external review systems of FOI
decisions operating in Australian jurisdictions, with a view to determining
the most effective for use in NSW. Three primary options are considered.
The first involves giving the Ombudsman exclusive and wide powers (and
resources) to conduct all external review of FOI decisions, while the second
proposes an establishment of an FOI Commissioner to administer the whole
Act including external review (as in Queensland and Western Australia).
The third involves the establishment of a NSW Administrative Appeals Tribunal
which would conduct external reviews of all Administrative law decisions
including FOI (as in Victoria and the Commonwealth).It is concluded that
an Information Commissioner would greatly improve NSW FOI law for a number
of reasons. These are discussed and such include accessibility, cost and
reduced delay because the processes would be undertaken by a non judicial
body which is solely devoted to FOI review .
Return to Wollongong Studies page